Ancient Astronauts And Contemporary Skepticism

Over the course of the past 12 months, I closely assisted a colleague in writing a collection of ten articles covering numerous aspects of my historical astronaut concept. All ten of those articles circulated widely across the globe and examine counters on many websites indicated plentiful readership, but feedback to me, or to her, from wherever, was non-existent. There was neither criticism nor acclaim from anybody. Just silence. I used to be starting to assume that perhaps nobody in world desires to take historic astronauts severely.

In an try to make some progress, I made a decision to pay sixty dollars for a evaluation of my historical astronaut website. In fact, this was to be a evaluation by skeptics; a evaluation by New Age believers can be nugatory. Their blog’s description was “crucial opinions of paranormal claims on the Internet.” The intermediary granted them 5 days to perform their evaluate but that has long since come and gone, and never a word from them. My web site presents an enormous quantity of proof and, in fact, I could not anticipate anybody to produce a good essential overview in simply 5 days. No one, together with myself, would wish to see rapidly prepared and frivolous arguments, else I would make them look ridiculous in my counter arguments. Furthermore, some of my evidence comes from Spanish-language sources and, to begin, they would want time to confirm that none of it’s a hoax. They’re welcome to all the time they want.

What to expect from this weblog is unsure. There are skeptics who are as narrow-minded of their thinking as their New Age counterparts, after which again, there are skeptics, like me, who objectively evaluate the evidence to reach at the fact. Was there a real ancient astronaut? To help the skeptics answer that question, I’ll give them some concepts on easy methods to refute my theories. Here, solely for area concerns, I’ll think about the archaeological proof, leaving apart ideas on find out how to refute the cryptology and theology evidence for another day.

My web site reproduces engravings from the Tiwanaku civilization in Bolivia. A type of engravings depicts the alleged ancient astronaut as an aquatic with a three-pronged tail, with every of the three prongs ending in a pod. How do the skeptics refute that? Simple. They simply need to show that the shape of these pods resembles some form of animal or flora to be found in that region. In other words, they should discover a terrestrial supply for these engravings, in any other case my extraterrestrial arguments remain unharmed.      The timing of the Tiwanaku sky-god drawings coincides with the timing of the Nazca Lines in Peru, so the ancient astronaut of both locations has to be one and the identical. For Nazca, the skeptics will discover many ready-made arguments, however I take into account all of them weak. The mentality of the folks of Nazca cannot be assumed to be distinctive in human historical past. It must be demonstrated that folks elsewhere also believed that the solar, moon, or sky-spirits had bodily eyes that might observe floor drawings. Alternatively, it has to be demonstrated that the folks of Nazca worshipped birds, believing them to have cognitive intelligence.

The recorded engravings on the cosmological Solar Disk, alleged alien artifact, may show to be the largest problem for the skeptics. How are we to believe that the Andeans of the early sixteenth century a) knew that the Earth was round, b) knew that it was potential to orbit the Earth, c) knew that daylight striking the moon could reflect back to strike a spaceship, d) knew that the dark clouds alongside the Milky Way contained stars within, and e) knew that water shaped the idea of plant and animal evolution? Here the skeptics would wish to seek out parallels in the history of western civilization. I sit up for their response. 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *