Ancient Astronauts And Contemporary Skepticism

Over the course of the past yr, I carefully assisted a colleague in writing a collection of ten articles overlaying various points of my historic astronaut principle. All ten of those articles circulated widely across the globe and view counters on many websites indicated plentiful readership, but suggestions to me, or to her, from anyplace, was non-existent. There was neither criticism nor acclaim from anyone. Simply silence. I was starting to assume that maybe nobody in world wants to take ancient astronauts seriously.

In an attempt to make some progress, I made a decision to pay sixty dollars for a overview of my historic astronaut web site. In fact, this was to be a evaluation by skeptics; a assessment by New Age believers would be nugatory. Their weblog’s description was “vital opinions of paranormal claims on the Internet.” The middleman granted them 5 days to perform their evaluate but that has lengthy since come and gone, and never a word from them. My website presents an enormous amount of proof and, in fact, I could not expect anyone to produce crucial evaluate in simply 5 days. No one, including myself, would want to see shortly prepared and frivolous arguments, else I would make them look ridiculous in my counter arguments. Furthermore, a few of my evidence comes from Spanish-language sources and, to begin, they would wish time to confirm that none of it is a hoax. They are welcome to on a regular basis they need.

What to expect from this blog is unsure. There are skeptics who’re as narrow-minded of their considering as their New Age counterparts, after which again, there are skeptics, like me, who objectively evaluate the proof to arrive at the fact. Was there an actual ancient astronaut? To help the skeptics answer that query, I will give them some concepts on methods to refute my theories. Here, solely for space concerns, I’ll focus on the archaeological proof, leaving aside concepts on methods to refute the cryptology and theology proof for one more day.

My website reproduces engravings from the Tiwanaku civilization in Bolivia. One of those engravings depicts the alleged historic astronaut as an aquatic with a three-pronged tail, with each of the three prongs ending in a pod. How do the skeptics refute that? Simple. They simply must display that the form of these pods resembles some form of animal or vegetation to be present in that region. In other phrases, they need to discover a terrestrial supply for these engravings, otherwise my extraterrestrial arguments remain unharmed.      The timing of the Tiwanaku sky-god drawings coincides with the timing of the Nazca Strains in Peru, so the traditional astronaut of each locations has to be one and the identical. For Nazca, the skeptics will find many ready-made arguments, but I contemplate all of them weak. The mentality of the people of Nazca cannot be assumed to be distinctive in human historical past. It must be demonstrated that people elsewhere additionally believed that the solar, moon, or sky-spirits had physical eyes that would observe floor drawings. Alternatively, it needs to be demonstrated that the people of Nazca worshipped birds, believing them to have cognitive intelligence.

The recorded engravings on the cosmological Sun Disk, alleged alien artifact, could show to be the most important problem for the skeptics. How are we to imagine that the Andeans of the early sixteenth century a) knew that the Earth was round, b) knew that it was possible to orbit the Earth, c) knew that sunlight putting the moon may replicate back to strike a spaceship, d) knew that the dark clouds alongside the Milky Means contained stars inside, and e) knew that water fashioned the premise of plant and animal evolution? Here the skeptics would wish to search out parallels in the historical past of western civilization. I sit up for their response. 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *